Vibecode FeedHive

track this build4 phases, 12 steps, beginner friendly
KINDA · weekend project
price $33.45/moyou'd save $401.4/yrbuild time multi-daycategory 🐦 social mediareplaced by 0 people

The visible AI social scheduling loop is buildable, but a credible replacement needs more than the first screen. FeedHive earns its keep through platform APIs, distribution, so expect a weekend or multi-day build and a narrower personal scope.

the project pack5 files · written for this build, step by step
README.md
# FeedHive · indie build

A scheduler for one author whose hard problems are that every network has a different and changing set of caps and formats, that a worker publishing a due post must do it exactly once even when the API times out, and that analytics history cannot be recovered after the fact so you either record it from day one or you do not have it.

Estimated effort: **weekend**. Work `BUILD_PLAN.md` top to bottom · every phase ends in a check that has to pass before the next one starts.

## Stack

| Part | Choice | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Runtime | Node 22, a small server-rendered editor and one worker process | scheduling is a worker problem and the editor is a thin skin over a queue |
| Storage | PostgreSQL for rows, media files on disk beside it, checksummed | a post is a row plus files and the files are the part that goes wrong |
| Publishing | Official platform APIs only, one adapter per network | anything that drives a logged-in browser session breaks the terms and loses the account |
| Scheduling | Due rows claimed by conditional update, with a per-attempt request identifier | two workers and one due post is a double publish that you cannot delete quietly |
| Limits | A limits table you fill in from the documentation, with the date you read it | the caps are published, they change, and guessing them costs you a suspended app |

## Before you start

Have every one of these ready. The plan assumes them from step one.

- [ ] **Node.js 22 or newer** · free
  - Why: Runs the editor and the worker.
  - Get it: nodejs.org or your version manager.
  - Verify: node --version prints v22 or higher
- [ ] **PostgreSQL 16 or newer** · free locally
  - Why: Holds posts, schedules and the append-only metric history, which grows and needs real indexes.
  - Get it: Your package manager or a small managed instance.
  - Verify: Migrations apply and the worker claims a row
- [ ] **A developer application per network you intend to publish to** · varies sharply by network; check each current published pricing page before you commit
  - Why: Each network has its own review, its own scopes and its own publishing caps, and at least one of them will refuse you.
  - Get it: Register an application on each network's developer portal and request the publishing permission.
  - Verify: A test post reaches each connected account through the API
- [ ] **ffmpeg** (optional) · free
  - Why: Per-network renditions are the only way to stop an upload being rejected for a format you did not check.
  - Get it: Your package manager.
  - Verify: ffmpeg -version prints a version
- [ ] **The limits table, filled in from current documentation** · free
  - Why: Every refusal in this build cites a number from this table, and a table filled in from memory produces refusals that are wrong in both directions.
  - Get it: Read each network's current publishing documentation and write the caps, windows and allowed types down with today's date.
  - Verify: Every row has a checked_on date and the editor shows it

## Quick start

Follow Phase 1 in `BUILD_PLAN.md`; it creates the project.

Then copy `.env.example` to `.env` and fill in the values it documents.

## Honest limits

This build deliberately does not replace:

- Anything driving a logged-in browser session.
- Automatic engagement and comment generation.
- Team approvals and shared asset libraries.
- Backfilled analytics from before collection started.
- analytics history and attribution
- team approvals and asset workflows
- protection from API and policy changes
- calendar-provider edge cases and timezone correctness
- reliable direct publishing across networks

If one of those is essential to you, that is the reason to keep paying for FeedHive, and the README should say so rather than pretend.

$ choose a build depth, inspect the files, then open the complete pack in your agent

why people still pay

FeedHive: Social tools survive because networks change APIs, permissions, formats, and anti-spam rules constantly.

what you lose

xanalytics history and attribution

xteam approvals and asset workflows

xprotection from API and policy changes

xcalendar-provider edge cases and timezone correctness

xreliable direct publishing across networks

prior art · use these instead of building, if you'd ratherPostizOpen-source social scheduling and publishing platform.↗MixpostSelf-hosted social media management software.↗
share on X ↗"I just replaced FeedHive ($33.45/mo) with one prompt"
the numbers

FeedHive pricing

planmonthlyannual (per mo)what you get
creator$21.91/workspace$17.30/workspace4 social accounts; 30 scheduled posts; scheduling up to 14 days ahead; 20 days of history; 25 drafts; 15 templates; 500 automations/month; 2,500 base AI credits/month.
brand$33.45/workspace$25.37/workspace10 social accounts; 5 workspaces; 500 scheduled posts; scheduling up to 60 days ahead; 200 days of history; 500 drafts; 50 templates; 2,000 automations/month; 10,000 base AI credits/month.
business$114.19/workspace$79.58/workspace100 social accounts; 50 workspaces; unlimited scheduled posts, history, drafts, and templates; 10,000 automations/month; 50,000 base AI credits/month.
agency$344.87/workspace$275.66/workspace500 social accounts; 100 workspaces; unlimited scheduled posts, history, drafts, and templates; 100,000 automations/month; 100,000 base AI credits/month.

free tierno free tier (7-day trial only)

billingmonthly + annual (annual saves up to 30%)

hidden costsThe doubled AI-credit allowance is a 3-month launch bonus, not the ongoing quota; public overage-credit prices were not disclosed.

verified 2026-08-14 · source ↗

questions
Vibecode FeedHive

Kinda. The core of FeedHive is buildable in a weekend with the prompt on this page, but there are real gaps: analytics history and attribution, team approvals and asset workflows. Read the honest list above before committing.

How much does FeedHive cost?

FeedHive costs about $33.45/month (Brand, checked 2026-08-14), which is $401.40000000000003 per year.

What do I lose by replacing FeedHive?

Honestly: analytics history and attribution; team approvals and asset workflows; protection from API and policy changes; calendar-provider edge cases and timezone correctness; reliable direct publishing across networks. If any of those are load-bearing for you, keep paying.

Is there an open-source alternative to FeedHive?

Yes: Postiz (Open-source social scheduling and publishing platform.), Mixpost (Self-hosted social media management software.). Using prior art is also vibecoding; the prompt is for when you want it exactly your way.